Jie “Ellen” Lin, RCIC

Canadian Immigration Consultant | 加拿大持牌移民顾问

← NLPNP Latest Updates | 返回纽芬兰与拉布拉多省提名最新动态

纽芬兰与拉布拉多省 9月10日再发36份省提名邀请

本轮全部属于NLPNP, 没有进行Atlantic Immigration Program申请选择

Newfoundland and Labrador Issues 36 New PNP Invitations on September 10

← 返回省提名项目 | Back to Provincial Nominee Programs

纽芬兰与拉布拉多省 9月10日再发36份省提名邀请

Read in English Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial Nominee Program NLPNP draw September 10 2026

纽芬兰与拉布拉多省于 2026年9月10日进行了新一轮移民邀请, 共发出 36份Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial Nominee Program(NLPNP)邀请。

本轮没有进行 Atlantic Immigration Program(AIP) 申请选择。

本轮公布了哪些信息?

项目 本轮结果
抽选日期 2026年9月10日
NLPNP邀请 36份
AIP选择 本轮没有
最低分数 未公布
职业类别 未公布
工资门槛 未公布

由于官方没有公布最低分数、 职业类别或工资门槛, 不能仅凭本轮36份邀请 判断国际毕业生、境外申请人 或某些特定职业的申请条件已经放宽。

对已经递交EOI的申请人有什么意义?

对于已经递交Expression of Interest(EOI)、 目前正在纽芬兰与拉布拉多省工作, 或已经获得当地雇主支持的申请人, 建议及时检查自己的申请账户和电子邮箱。

如果已经收到邀请, 应尽快确认:

  • 邀请所适用的具体类别;
  • 正式申请的递交期限;
  • 当地雇主支持是否仍然有效;
  • 当前加拿大身份及工作许可情况;
  • 工作、职业及其他项目资格是否仍然符合要求。

36份邀请是否意味着机会变少?

不能仅凭单轮邀请数量得出这个结论。

本轮规模确实较小, 只有36份邀请。

但是官方并没有公布 本轮具体筛选标准, 因此不能把36份邀请 简单理解为项目收紧, 也不能据此判断 某类申请人的机会已经明显下降。

同样, 也不能因为省政府持续发出邀请, 就认为国际毕业生、 境外申请人 或某些职业的申请条件已经放宽。

纽芬兰与拉布拉多省仍在持续邀请

虽然本轮规模不大, 但纽芬兰与拉布拉多省近期 仍然持续通过NLPNP进行邀请。

对已经在当地建立就业联系、 获得雇主支持 并符合项目要求的申请人来说, 机会仍然存在。

与其只关注每一轮邀请人数, 更重要的是提前确认自己的项目资格、 工作情况、雇主支持和加拿大身份, 并准备好必要材料。

有当地Job Offer的申请人应该怎么做?

如果申请人已经获得 纽芬兰与拉布拉多省雇主的Job Offer, 可以进一步评估 NLPNP以及Atlantic Immigration Program 是否分别存在适用机会。

两个项目虽然都可能通向永久居民身份, 但对申请人和雇主的要求并不完全相同。

因此, 更合理的做法是结合申请人的职业、 工作经验、当地Job Offer、 雇主支持、语言能力及加拿大身份, 比较不同项目的可行性。

Newfoundland and Labrador Issues 36 New PNP Invitations on September 10

Newfoundland and Labrador conducted another immigration selection round on September 10, 2026, issuing 36 invitations under the Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial Nominee Program (NLPNP).

There were no selections under the Atlantic Immigration Program (AIP) in this round.

What Information Was Published?

  • Date: September 10, 2026;
  • NLPNP invitations: 36;
  • AIP selections: None;
  • Minimum score: Not published;
  • Occupational breakdown: Not published;
  • Wage threshold: Not published.

Because detailed selection criteria were not published, the results should not be interpreted as evidence that requirements have become easier for international graduates, overseas applicants, or particular occupations.

What Does This Mean for Applicants?

Applicants who have already submitted an Expression of Interest, are working in Newfoundland and Labrador, or have support from a local employer should check their accounts and email for possible invitations.

Candidates who receive an invitation should promptly review the applicable program, submission deadline, employer support, immigration status and continued eligibility.

Does a Smaller Draw Mean Fewer Opportunities?

Not necessarily.

This was a relatively small round, with only 36 invitations issued.

However, the province did not publish detailed selection criteria, so the size of this round alone should not be interpreted as evidence that the program has become more restrictive.

Likewise, the continued issuance of invitations should not be interpreted as evidence that requirements have been relaxed for any particular applicant group.

Newfoundland and Labrador Continues to Issue Invitations

Newfoundland and Labrador continues to issue invitations through the NLPNP.

Applicants with strong local employment connections, employer support, and continued program eligibility may still have opportunities.

Rather than focusing only on the number of invitations issued in each round, applicants should ensure that their employment, employer support, immigration status and program eligibility remain in order.

Applicants with a Local Job Offer

Applicants who already have a job offer from a Newfoundland and Labrador employer may wish to assess both the NLPNP and the Atlantic Immigration Program.

The two programs have different eligibility requirements, employer requirements and application processes.

Occupation, work experience, job offer, employer support, language ability and immigration status should all be considered when determining which pathway may be appropriate.